Becker Holding Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          barred because it was issued after expiration of the period of              
          limitations for assessment of taxes.                                        
               Respondent filed an Answer to Amended Petition on November             
          14, 2003, and, on November 26, 2003, filed a Motion for Partial             
          Summary Judgment with supporting affidavits, seeking judgment               
          that no settlement had been reached and that the notice of                  
          deficiency was issued within the period of limitations for the              
          assessment of taxes and, therefore, was not barred.                         
               The parties filed objections to each others’ motions.                  
                                     Discussion                                       
               A decision on a motion for partial summary judgment may be             
          rendered if the pleadings and other materials in the record show            
          that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a           
          decision may be rendered as a matter of law.  Rule 121(b);                  
          Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd.            
          17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994).  The Court has considered the                  
          pleadings and other materials in the record and concludes that              
          there is no genuine issue of any material fact as it relates to             
          the cross-motions of the parties and that a decision may be                 
          rendered as a matter of law.                                                
          I.  Settlement                                                              
               Petitioner contends that this case was settled by Mr.                  
          Leonard and Mr. Kaufman prior to the issuance of the notice of              
          deficiency.  Respondent contends that Mr. Kaufman lacked the                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011