Becker Holding Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          authority to bind the Commissioner to a settlement and that,                
          therefore, a settlement did not occur.                                      
               A settlement is a contract, and, consequently, general                 
          principles of contract law determine whether a settlement has               
          been reached.  Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. v. Commissioner, 52 T.C.           
          420, 435-436 (1969), supplemented by 53 T.C. 275 (1969).  In tax            
          cases, settlement offers made and accepted by letters have been             
          enforced as binding agreements.  Dorchester Indus. Inc. v.                  
          Commissioner, 108 T.C. 320, 333-334 (1997), affd. without                   
          published opinion 208 F.3d 205 (3d Cir. 2000); Haiduk v.                    
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-506; Himmelwright v. Commissioner,            
          T.C. Memo. 1988-114.  A settlement agreement may even be reached            
          in the absence of a writing.  Haiduk v. Commissioner, supra                 
          (citing Green v. John H. Lewis & Co., 436 F.2d 389 (3d Cir.                 
          1971)).                                                                     
               A settlement agreement may be reached by authorized agents             
          or officials representing the parties.  See Dorchester Indus.               
          Inc. v. Commissioner, supra at 331.  Whether an attorney has                
          authority to settle a case on behalf of a taxpayer is a factual             
          question to be decided according to common law principles of                
          agency.  Id.; see Adams v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 359, 369-372               
          (1985); Kraasch v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 623, 627-629 (1978).               
          The parties do not dispute that Mr. Leonard had authority to bind           
          petitioner to a settlement in the instant case.                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011