Ronald J. and June M. Speltz - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
                             SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION                               
               Should the lien be released or withdrawn?                              
               No, the tax as assessed is deemed correct and the offer                
               in compromise proposed by the taxpayers has been                       
               rejected.                                                              
                                  BRIEF BACKGROUND                                    
               Mr. and Mrs. Speltz filed their 2000 return showing a                  
               liability of $209,749.77.  They made a payment with the                
               return of $17,565.  Payments of $70,000 were made prior                
               to an installment agreement which was entered into for                 
               $2,500.  Two payments of $2,500 made prior to the                      
               filing of an offer in compromise of $4,457 on                          
               11/2/2001.  The offer was rejected due to the taxpayers                
               having assets and the ability to full pay the                          
               liability.  A lien was then filed.  The taxpayers’                     
               representative states on the request for a collection                  
               due process hearing that the personal residence                        
               constitutes exempt property and therefore the IRS’                     
               attempted lien is unenforceable.  A phone conference                   
               was held with the representative, * * * who questioned                 
               whether there was any pending legislation aimed at                     
               changing how the alternative minimum tax is computed.                  
               A check with the national office shows that there is no                
               pending legislation to retroactively adjust how the                    
               alternative minimum tax is computed.                                   
                               DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS                                
               1.  Verification of legal and procedural requirements;                 
               Yes                                                                    
               2.  Issues raised by the taxpayer; The offer in                        
               compromise was rejected.                                               
               3.  Balancing of need for efficient collection with                    
               taxpayer concern that the collection action be no more                 
               intrusive than necessary.  The collection action                       
               balances the need for the efficient collection of taxes                
               with the Speltz’s legitimate concern that the                          
               collection action be no more intrusive than necessary.                 
               The petition in this case was filed by petitioners pro se;             
          counsel entered his appearance after respondent filed a motion              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011