Ronald J. and June M. Speltz - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         

                    Example 1.  The taxpayer has assets sufficient to                 
               satisfy the tax liability.  The taxpayer provides full                 
               time care and assistance to her dependent child, who                   
               has a serious long-term illness.  It is expected that                  
               the taxpayer will need to use the equity in his assets                 
               to provide for adequate basic living expenses and                      
               medical care for his child.  The taxpayer’s overall                    
               compliance history does not weigh against compromise.                  
                    Example 2.  The taxpayer is retired and his only                  
               income is from a pension.  The taxpayer’s only asset is                
               a retirement account, and the funds in the account are                 
               sufficient to satisfy the liability.  Liquidation of                   
               the retirement account would leave the taxpayer without                
               an adequate means to provide for basic living expenses.                
               The taxpayer’s overall compliance history does not                     
               weigh against compromise.                                              
                    Example 3.  The taxpayer is disabled and lives on                 
               a fixed income that will not, after allowance of basic                 
               living expenses, permit full payment of his liability                  
               under an installment agreement.  The taxpayer also owns                
               a modest house that has been specially equipped to                     
               accommodate his disability.  The taxpayer’s equity in                  
               the house is sufficient to permit payment of the                       
               liability he owes.  However, because of his disability                 
               and limited earning potential, the taxpayer is unable                  
               to obtain a mortgage or otherwise borrow against this                  
               equity.  In addition, because the taxpayer’s home has                  
               been specially equipped to accommodate his disability,                 
               forced sale of the taxpayer’s residence would create                   
               severe adverse consequences for the taxpayer.  The                     
               taxpayer’s overall compliance history does not weigh                   
               against compromise.                                                    
          Under the regulations, a compromise may also be entered into to             
          promote efficient tax administration if there are compelling                
          public policy or equity considerations identified by the                    
          taxpayer.  Compromise is justified where, due to exceptional                
          circumstances, collection would undermine public confidence that            
          tax laws are being administered fairly. Sec.                                






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011