Brogan v. United States, 522 U.S. 398, 24 (1998)

Page:   Index   Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24

Cite as: 522 U. S. 398 (1998)

Stevens, J., dissenting

opinio is of good authoritie in law." 4 1 E. Coke, Institutes 186a (15th ed. 1794).

Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

421

4 The majority's invocation of the maxim communis error facit jus adds little weight to their argument. As Lord Ellenborough stated in Isher-wood v. Oldknow, 3 Maule & Selwyn 382, 396-397 (K. B. 1815):

"It has been sometimes said, communis error facit jus; but I say communis opinio is evidence of what the law is; not where it is an opinion merely speculative and theoretical floating in the minds of persons, but where it has been made the ground-work and substratum of practice." See also United States v. The Reindeer, 27 F. Cas. 758, 762 (No. 16,145) (CC RI 1848).

Page:   Index   Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24

Last modified: October 4, 2007