Appeal No. 93-2460
Application No. 07/590,647
I. Claims 1 through 7, 38 through 45 and 48 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for
failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the
subject matter which the applicants regard as the invention.
II. Claims 1 through 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first and second paragraphs, as the claimed invention is not
described in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to
enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same,
and/or for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim
the subject matter which the applicants regard as the invention.
III. Claims 1 through 4 and 6 through 47 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as the disclosure is
enabling only for claims limited to modifications of the
sequences shown in Figure 1.
IV. Claims 22, 30, 38 through 41, 46 and 47 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as the disclosure is
enabling only for claims limited to dicot plants.
V. Claim 46 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, as the disclosure is only enabling for claims limited
to the modifications of the plant-derived sequences shown in
Figure 1.
33
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007