Ex parte PLUMTON et al. - Page 1




                      THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                    
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not             
          binding precedent of the Board.                                             
                                                            Paper No. 11              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                    Ex parte DONALD L. PLUMTON and HAN-TZONG YUAN                     
                                    _____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 95-0347                                   
                               Application 08/056,6811                                
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before URYNOWICZ, LEE and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 12 and 13.  Claims 16-19           
          have been withdrawn from consideration, and claims 3, 6, 8-11, 14           
          and 15 have been objected to as being dependent on a rejected               
          claim.  No claim has been allowed.                                          



               1Application for patent filed April 30, 1993.                          
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007