Appeal No. 95-0523
Application No. 07/885,490
Claims 24 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as
anticipated by Roy.
Roy teaches a composition which contains lipase, amylase
and protease enzymes. See column 1, lines 29-34 of Roy. Roy
teaches that the enzyme compositions are intended to aid in
the digestibility of food. See column 1, lines 25-29. In any
case, the use of the composition to increase digestibility of
a specific food, i.e. non-human milk baby formula, is not
presented as a claim limitation in claims 24 and 25.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner refusing to allow claims 1-
26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
Claims 24-26 are newly rejected by the authority of 37
CFR
§ 1.196(b) and under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by either
Mochizuki or Sipos.
17
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007