THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NAOKI KUMAGAI
and KATSUNORI UENO
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0648
Application 08/001,1991
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 13-19 and 21-23.
The invention pertains to a short protective circuit. Claim 13, the only independent claim,
is illustrative and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed January 7, 1993. According to appellants, this application is
a continuation-in-part of Application 07/854,085, filed March 19, 1992, now U.S. Patent No.
5,303,110, granted April 14, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007