Ex parte SHIH et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 95-2011                                                          
          Application No. 07/959,011                                                  


               surrounded by a graft polymerized rubber layer, and                    
               optionally encapsulated with a graft polymerized                       
               rigid outer layer. [Emphasis added.]                                   

          Thus, it would appear from appellants’ characterization of the              
          teachings of U.S. Patent No. 3,661,994 that the graft polymer               
          disclosed therein forms a shell around a separate polymeric                 
          core to produce a core-shell polymer as claimed by appellants.              


               Accordingly, we agree with appellants that Ting is                     
          directed to a different product than the claimed invention                  
          (Brief, p. 3):                                                              
               [The Ting product] does not comprise a core-shell                      
               polymer where epoxy resin is present in the core                       
               polymer which is encapsulated with a shell polymer,                    
               disclosed therein i.e., the shell is formed on the                     
               core polymer which contains the epoxy component.  In                   
               Ting, the epoxy is not in a core as in the core-                       
               shell containing product of this invention but is                      
               rather dispersed or mixed throughout the                               
               composition.                                                           

          See In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1143, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444                
          (Fed. Cir. 1992) (the examiner bears the initial burden of                  
          presenting a prima facie case of unpatentability).                          




                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007