Appeal No. 95-2221
Application No. 07/994,072
The issues presented for review are:
(1) Whether the examiner correctly rejected the
appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as
based on an original specification which does not provide
adequate written descriptive support for the instantly claimed
invention;
(2) Whether the examiner correctly rejected claims
1-3, 6, and 10-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by,
or in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over
Parker;
(3) Whether the examiner correctly rejected claim 9
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Parker in view of Serafini;
(4) Whether the examiner correctly rejected claims
19-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Parker in view of Adams;
(5) Whether the examiner correctly rejected claim 24
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Parker in view of
Benedick;
(6) Whether the examiner correctly rejected claims
1-8 and 10-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
Parker in view of Peoples;
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007