Ex parte DUNSON et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 95-2221                                                          
          Application No. 07/994,072                                                  


          the goals of Parker's invention.  Moreover, the appealed                    
          method requires a heat treatment of a three layer composite to              
          form a plasticized structure and "then cooling" to effect the               
          solidification of the non-woven layers.  As evident from the                
          disclosure referred to above in Parker, Parker's process does               
          not involve an "immediate" cooling step, after the heating of               
          the composite layers.  Indeed, Parker only cools, after the                 
          article is shaped by the press molding step.                                
               Accordingly, we cannot sustain rejection (7).  Moreover,               
          since the "secondary references" utilized in rejections (8),                
          (9) and (10) do not remedy the basic defects in the examiner's              
          rejection (7), we cannot sustain these rejections.                          
               The decision of the examiner is reversed.                              














                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007