THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TIMO HYPPANEN
____________
Appeal No. 95-3119
Application No. 08/089,8101
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 24 and 27. Claim 26 2
has been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as
being drawn to a nonelected invention. Claims 8 and 25 have been
canceled.
1Application for patent filed July 12, 1993. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of the
following three applications: Application No. 08/041,571, filed
April 5, 1993; Application No. 08/041,580, filed April 5, 1993;
and Application No. 08/066,277, filed May 26, 1993.
2Claim 10 has been amended subsequent to the final
rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007