Ex parte KISHI et al. - Page 13




          Appeal No. 95-4187                                                          
          Application 07/835,374                                                      



                    Appellants on pages 12 through 14 argue the specific              
          limitations recited in claims 7, 15 through 17 and 23 through               
          25.                                                                         


          We note that the Examiner has not addressed these limitations.              
          Upon a review of Tsuruta, we fail to find any express                       
          teachings of these limitations.                                             
                    In view of the foregoing, the decision of the                     
          Examiner rejecting claim 1, 3 through 6 and 8, 11, 14 and 22                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is affirmed; however, the decision of                 
          the Examiner rejecting claims 7, 15 through 17 and 23 through               
          25 under        35 U.S.C. § 102 is reversed.                                
                    No time period for taking any subsequent action in                
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 
                                  AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    




                         STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR.    )                               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               


                                          13                                          





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007