Ex parte ALLEN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-4433                                                           
          Application No. 07/994,040                                                   


               The subject matter on appeal relates to crystalline                     
          azithromycin dihydrate and to a method for the preparation                   
          thereof.  Further details of this subject matter are readily                 
          apparent from a review of the appealed claims which read as                  
          follows:                                                                     

               1.   Crystalline azithromycin dihydrate.                                
               2.   A method of preparing crystalline azithromycin                     
          dihydrate which comprises crystallization of amorphous                       
          azithromycin or azithromycin monohydrate from a mixture of                   
          tetrahydrofuran and a (C -C ) aliphatic hydrocarbon in the                   
                                  5  7                                                 
          presence of at least 2 molar equivalents of water.                           
               3.   A method of claim 2 wherein the hydrocarbon is                     
          hexane.                                                                      

               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of               
          obviousness are:                                                             
          Desposato et al. (Desposato)        4,219,641                Aug.            
          26, 1980                                                                     
          Bright                        4,474,768                 Oct.  2,             
          1984                                                                         

               Claims 1 through 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                 
          as being unpatentable over Bright in view of Desposato.                      
               This rejection cannot be sustained.                                     



                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007