Appeal No. 95-4433 Application No. 07/994,040 of water as required by appealed claim 2. This is because Desposato, although disclosing the existence of erythromycin dihydrate (see line 6 in column 3), contains no disclosure regarding the crystalline form of this compound much less crystalline azithromycin dihydrate. Similarly, although patentee discloses crystallizing erythromycin ethyl succinate from an aqueous mixture containing tetrahydrofuran as solvent or ethyl acetate as solvent combined with hexane (e.g., see lines 37 through 56 in column 1), Desposato contains no disclosure of using a mixture of tetrahydrofuran and a C -C 5 7 aliphatic hydrocarbon in the presence of at least two molar equivalents of water in order to prepare crystalline azithromycin dihydrate. As rebuttal evidence, the appellants have advanced a number of declarations. These declarations include the Forcier Declaration signed March 19, 1992 and the Hangac Declaration signed February 16, 1994 which compare respectively the hygroscopicity and stability characteristics of crystalline azithromycin dihydrate and azithromycin monohydrate. Notwithstanding the examiner’s criticisms thereof, these declarations quite plainly show that the 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007