THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte CHARLES C. NEGUS, ROBERT I. RUDKO,
STEPHEN J. LINHARES and STEPHEN M. PEREZ
________________
Appeal No. 95-4462
Application 08/190,9501
________________
HEARD: APRIL 8, 1998
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, STAAB
and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1-11, all the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed February 3, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007