THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HIROSHI ONODA
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4622
Application 08/113,6651
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 23 and 42 to 49. Appellant has
1Application for patent filed August 31, 1993. According
to the appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/851,294, filed March 12, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007