THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WILLIAM B. FARNHAM and MARIO J. NAPPA
__________
Appeal No. 95-5067
Application 08/064,5751
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 13 through 15, 19, 21/19,
22/21/19, 23/22/21/19 and 24/22/21/19. Claims 28 and 70 have
been indicated as allowable by the examiner (see the Advisory
1 Application for patent filed May 21, 1993. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/645,030, filed January 23, 1993,
now Patent No. 5,243,025, issued September 7, 1993; which is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/243,396, filed September 12, 1988, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007