Ex Parte GUPTA et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-0125                                                          
          Application 07/878,100                                                      



               b) means for storing data representative of said product               
          identification;                                                             
               c) means for storing product specifications; and                       
               d) processing means operatively connected to said means for            
          inputting product identification, to said means for storing data            
          representative of said product identification and to said means             
          for storing product specifications, said processing means being             
          programmed to select said identified product, a competing product           
          to said identified product or a complimentary product to said               
          identified product for promotion based upon rules for selecting a           
          product for promotion in response to said data representative of            
          said product identification wherein said processing means                   
          accesses said stored product specifications and promotes a                  
          product by displaying said store product specifications of said             
          product selected for promotion to said customer.                            

          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Humble                        4,825,045          Apr. 25, 1989              
          Vela et al. (Vela)            4,882,724          Nov. 21, 1989              
          Schneider                     5,083,638          Jan. 28, 1992              
          (filed Sep. 18, 1990)                                                       
          “Ads On Wheels Roll Into Supermarkets,” Chain Store Age                     
          Executive, Vol. 64, no. 9, pages 49 and 51 (September 1988)                 
          (Chain Store)                                                               
          Claims 1-26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                       
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers the basic combination           
          of Vela in view of Humble with respect to claims 1-3, 5, 7, 8 and           
          17-25.  Chain Store is added to the basic combination with                  
          respect to claims 9-16 and 26.  Schneider is added to the basic             
          combination with respect to claims 4 and 6.                                 

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007