Ex Parte GUPTA et al - Page 13




          Appeal No. 96-0125                                                          
          Application 07/878,100                                                      



          of the other claims in this application may be subject to a                 
          rejection similar to our new rejection of claim 1.                          
          In summary, the rejection of claims 1-26 under 35 U.S.C.                    
          § 103 as formulated by the examiner is reversed.  We have entered           
          a new ground of rejection of claim 1 under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).               
          This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant                   
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final               
          rule notice 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203               
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1977)).  37             
          CFR § 1.196(b) provides that “A new ground of rejection shall not           
          be considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                       
          37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                         
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new ground             
          of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (§ 1.197(c)) as            
          to the rejected claims:                                                     
                        (1) Submit an appropriate amendment                          
                         of the claims so rejected or a                               
                         showing of facts relating to the                             
                         claims so rejected, or both, and                             
                         have the matter reconsidered by the                          
                         examiner, in which event the                                 
                         application will be remanded to the                          
                         examiner. . . .                                              


                                         13                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007