THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MEHMET Y. BOLUK, MICHAEL S.
JARRELL, BARBARA J. BRYMER
and GERMAIN ARCHAMBAULT
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0126
Application 07/942,4001
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1 through 10 which are all of the claims in the
application.
The subject matter on appeal relates to a deicer
1Application for patent filed September 9, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007