Appeal No. 96-0126
Application 07/942,400
For the above stated reasons, we additionally sustain the
examiner’s § 103 rejection of process claims 9 and 10 as being
unpatentable over Ma and Konig-Lumer in view of Seaman.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
)
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007