Ex parte WANG - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-0273                                                          
          Application No. 08/246,387                                                  


          claim 7 was amended.  Claims 11 and 12 have been found to be                
          allowable over the prior art of record.                                     
               The disclosed invention relates to a method and system                 
          for detecting the presence of a Supervisory Audio Tone (SAT)                
          superimposed on a voice/data signal.                                        
               Claims 1 and 9 are illustrative of the claimed invention,              
          and they read as follows:                                                   
               1.  A method for detecting the presence of a Supervisory               
          Audio Tone (SAT) when the SAT is superimposed on a Frequency-               
          Modulated (FM) voice/data signal to yield a combined signal                 
          which is periodically sampled, comprising the steps of:                     
               (a) receiving successive samples of the combined                       
          voice/data and SAT signal such that noise associated with said              
          combined                                                                    
          signal is suppressed and the combined signal is captured when               
          the signal power of the combined signal exceeds the power of                
          the noise and the combined signal is suppressed and the noise               
          is captured when the power of the noise exceeds the power of                
          the combined signal;                                                        
               (b) deleting the voice/data signal from a sample                       
          containing the combined voice/data and SAT signal so that only              
          the SAT remains:                                                            
               (c) determining the signal power of the SAT;                           
               (d) determining the noise power of the SAT, the SAT                    
          noise power moving in an opposite direction from the SAT                    
          signal power; and                                                           
               (e) comparing the signal power to the noise power of the               
          SAT to determine if the signal power of the SAT exceeds the                 
          noise power of the SAT as occurs when the SAT is present.                   
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007