Ex parte WANG - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-0273                                                          
          Application No. 08/246,387                                                  


               9.  A system for detecting the presence of a Supervisory               
          Audio Tone (SAT), when superimposed on a voice/data signal, to              
          yield a combined signal which is periodically sampled,                      
          comprising:                                                                 
               (a) means for deleting the voice/data signal from a                    
          sample of the combined voice/data and SAT signal so that only               
          the SAT remains;                                                            
               (b) means for determining the signal power of the                      
          remaining SAT;                                                              
               (c) means for determining the noise power of the                       
          remaining SAT; and                                                          
               (d) means for comparing the SAT signal power to the SAT                
          noise power to determine if the signal power of the SAT                     
          exceeds the noise power of the SAT as occurs when the SAT is                
          present in the combined signal.                                             
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Wang                               5,001,742                Mar.            
          19, 1991                                                                    
          Taub et al. (Taub), “Principles of Communication Systems,                   
          Chapter 14: Communication System and Noise Calculations,”                   
          pages 610 through 633, 1986.                                                
               Claims 1 through 8 stand rejected under the first                      
          paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 as being based upon a non-                     
          enabling disclosure.                                                        
               Claims 1 through 8 stand rejected under the second                     
          paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 as being indefinite for failing                



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007