Ex parte GOODMAN et al. - Page 2




         Appeal No. 96-4102                                                         
         Application 08/500,421                                                     


              The claimed invention is directed to a tear-open container            
         formed of tear-resistant material.  The ends of the container              
         have heat-sealed joints with at least one heat-sealed joint                
         having an elongated tear-propagating slit formed therein.                  
              Claim 4, reproduced below is further illustrative of the              
         claimed subject matter.                                                    
              4.  A tear-open bag for containing a flowable material, said          
         bag being formed with a non-tearable heat-sealable synthetic               
         resin, said bag comprising opposite end portions at least one of           
         which is closed by means of an expanded planer [sic, planar] heat          
         seal joint, said bag being formed with angled corners at opposite          
         sides of said heat seal joint, and an elongated tear-propagating           
         slit extending through said heat seal joint and not extending to           
         the edges of the bag, said slit being wholly contained within              
         said heat seal joint, and said slit being oriented relative to             
         one of said corners so as to be operable, when manually stressed,          
         to propagate a tear line in the bag which is oblique relative to           
         said one corner so that said one corner can be manually torn away          
         from the remainder of the bag and thereby form a pouring spout in          
         the bag.2                                                                  
              The reference cited by the examiner as evidence of                    
         anticipation and obviousness is:                                           
         Arcudi                   3,809,220                May 7, 1974              
              The following rejections are on appeal:                               
              Claim 4 has been rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being             
         clearly anticipated by Arcudi.                                             



              We have interpreted the claim expression “non-tearable” found in2                                                                    
         line 2 of claim 4 on appeal as directed to a tear-resistant material.      
                                         2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007