Ex parte CERMINARA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-0289                                                          
          Application No. 08/111,332                                                  


               The disclosed invention relates to a modular leakage                   
          current detector and interrupter.                                           
               Claim 7 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               7.  A modular leakage current detector and interrupter                 
          comprising:                                                                 
               a sense module for detecting ground fault currents in                  
          excess of a given value, the sense module including circuitry               
          to provide an interrupt signal,                                             
               a circuit interrupt module mounted remote from the sense               
          module and interconnected to the sense module to disconnect                 
          power to the machine upon receipt of the interrupt signal, and              
               a test and control module mounted remote from the sense                
          module, the test and control module providing a fault signal                
          to periodically test the operability of the modular leakage                 
          current detector and interrupter.                                           
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Gryctko et al. (Gryctko)           3,812,400                May             
          21, 1974                                                                    
          Morris et al. (Morris)        4,686,600                Aug. 11,             
          1987                                                                        
               Claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 8 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gryctko in view of               
          Morris.                                                                     
               Reference is made to the brief and the answer for the                  
          respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                    

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007