Ex parte HAMAEKERS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-0996                                                          
          Application 08/287,432                                                      


          appealed subject matter and read as follows:                                
               1.   A method for manufacturing a bearing comprising an                
          elastic spring element made of rubber that is affixed to a ring             
          element made of an elastically deformable material, comprising              
          the steps of:                                                               
               bending a lamellar section of sheet metal into a cylindrical           
          shape; and                                                                  
               deforming the sheet metal into the shape of a ring element             
          having a uniform thickness.                                                 
               5.   A method for manufacturing a metal ring element for use           
          in a bearing, comprising the steps of:                                      
               bending a lamellar section of sheet metal into a cylindrical           
          shape; and                                                                  
               deforming the sheet metal into a shape comprising a conical            
          portion and a contiguous disk-like portion that is set at an                
          angle with respect to the conical portion so that the ring                  
          element is of uniform thickness.                                            
               The following reference of record is relied upon by the                
          examiner in support of the rejections:                                      
          Ingersoll                2,382,485      Aug. 14, 1945                       
               In addition, the examiner relies upon appellant’s admitted             
          prior art (AAPA) as set forth on pages 1 and 2 of the                       
          specification.                                                              
               Claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being            
          anticipated by Ingersoll.                                                   



                                          -2-                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007