THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROBERT M. KEENAN
__________
Appeal No. 97-2833
Application 08/236,1901
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 34, 35, 37-39, 41-
46, 48-50, 52-57, 59-61, 63-66, 82, 83, 85 and 87-91, which are all of the claims
remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed May 2, 1994. According to the appellant, the
application is a division of Application 08/012,379, filed February 2, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007