Ex parte WINNER - Page 9




          Appeal No. 97-3194                                         Page 9           
          Application No. 08/442,816                                                  


          portable articles to lock the same against removal or                       
          transportation (page 1, lines 8-11).  As shown in Figure 2,                 
          Damon's lock includes                                                       
          (1) a U-shaped bar or rod 1 having upon one end teeth 2, (2) a              
          U-shaped hollow tube 3, and (3) a locking assembly mounted                  
          upon one end of the tube 3 for engagement with the teeth 2.                 
          Damon's locking assembly includes flanges 7 integral with the               
          tube 3, a toothed plate 8, a spring 10, a cover 11, a screw-                
          threaded projection 16, and a key 18.  In addition, Damon                   
          teaches (page 1, lines 42-54) that                                          
               [t]he other end of the bar 1 has a longitudinal groove 4,              
               terminating in an L-shaped groove 5, which engages a lug               
               6 on the inside of one end of the tube or sleeve 3, so                 
               that the shackle [bar 1] may be operated to slide in or                
               out of the sleeve the whole length of the said groove 4                
               with the toothed end of the shackle in or out of the                   
               sleeve without separating the shackle from the sleeve,                 
               said shackle being turned to have the lug 6 engage the L-              
               shaped groove 5 to  put the toothed end of the shackle                 
               out of the out of the line with the sleeve or to separate              
               the sleeve entirely.                                                   


               After the scope and content of the prior art are                       
          determined, the differences between the prior art and the                   
          claims at issue are to be ascertained.  Graham v. John Deere                
          Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18, 148 USPQ 459, 467 (1966).                           







Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007