THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent
of the Board.
Paper No.
23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANTHONY M. HUMPHREY,
BRIDGET A. SKILL,
and JUDITH L. KINDERLERER
____________
Appeal No. 1995-2659
Application No. 07/896,7051
____________
Heard: September 13, 1999
____________
Before WINTERS, GRON, and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REVERSE AND REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 8-22
and 31-33, all the claims pending in the application. On consideration of the record, we
1Application for patent filed June 10, 1992. According to appellants, this application is
a division of Application o7/576,633, filed August 31, 1990, now U.S. Patent 5,185,252
issued February 9, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007