Appeal No. 96-0088
Application No. 08/038,426
Robinson (Robinson ‘483) 4,475,483 Oct.
9, 1984
Reinhard et al. (Reinhard) 4,517,926 May 21,
1985
Bowers et al. (Bowers ‘302) 4,752,302 Jun. 21,
1988
Baird, Jr. (Baird) 4,787,969 Nov. 29,
1988
Henk et al. (Henk) 4,868,148 Sep. 19,
1989
Bowers et al. (Bowers ‘050) 4,891,050 Jan. 2,
1990
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 3, 19, 23 and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, first paragraph, for failing to enable any person
skilled in the art to make and use the invention.
Claims 1 and 4 through 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, for failing to particularly point out
and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicants
regard as the invention.
Claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 16, 23 and 27 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by Lyons.
Claims 1, 4 through 9, 16, 23 and 27 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 102 (b) as being anticipated by Bowers ‘302.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007