Appeal No. 96-0088
Application No. 08/038,426
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1 and 4 through 27 under the
second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is reversed.
The rejection of 3, 19, 23 and 25 under the first
paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 16, 23 and 27 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by Lyons is
affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1, 4 through 9 and 16 under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Bowers ‘302 is
affirmed. The rejection of claims 23 and 27 under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Bowers ‘302 is
reversed.
The rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 16, 18, 23 and 27 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by Bowers ‘050
is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1, 4 through 12, 14, 16, and 23
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by
Robinson ‘483 is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1, 4 through 14, 16, 18 through
21, 23 through 25 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
18
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007