THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOSEPH L. VERANTH
__________
Appeal No. 96-0418
Application 08/051,3211
___________
HEARD: May 7, 1999
___________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 9 2
1Application for patent filed February 18, 1993. According to the appellant,
the application is a continuation of Application 07/540,108, filed June 19, 1990, now
abandoned.
2 An additional reference was added under the new ground of rejection of all
these claims in the Examiner’s answer.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007