THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MITSUHIRO TAKAHASHI,
SEIJI TATEYAMA, and
MASAHIDE TOMITA
__________
Appeal No. 96-1727
Application 08/130,5751
__________
HEARD: April 7, 1999
__________
Before THOMAS, DIXON, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims
1 and 4 through 9, which constitute all the claims in the application.
1Application for patent filed October 1, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007