Ex parte EICHENAUER et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 96-1795                                                          
          Application No. 08/262,745                                                  


          achieve an average molecular weight.  At most, the examiner                 
          has shown that a higher M  fraction may contain some amount of              
                                   w                                                  
          a lower M  fraction.  However, the examiner has not shown that              
                   w                                                                  
          the higher molecular weight SAN fraction of Eichenauer I, II,               
          or Cincera will necessarily contain the specific amounts and                
          average molecular weights recited for the lower average                     
          molecular weight fractions of appealed claim 1.  Even assuming              
          the examiner’s argument of inherency is correct, the examiner               
          has not shown or explained why Cincera meets the limitation of              
          appealed claim 1 that “the 0.1 to 10 parts by weight of                     
          component C) is in addition to any thermoplastic copolymers or              
          terpolymers having an average molecular weight (M ) in the                  
                                                           w                          
          range from 1,500 to 6,000 that may be present in components A)              
          and B).” (Emphasis added, see the Answer, page 9).                          
               For the foregoing reasons, the rejections under § 102(b)               
          over Cincera and under § 102(e) over Eichenauer I or II are                 
          reversed.                                                                   
               B.  The Rejections under § 103                                         
               As noted by the examiner on page 6 of the Answer, Cincera              
          discloses components A), B) and D) as recited in appealed                   


                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007