Appeal No. 96-2237
Application 08/113,509
address transfer or a single address request for a single
instruction word or a single data word is what is implemented
in Figure 6 and for a corresponding data access as well. Only
a single address is sought from which other addresses may be
sequentially indexed in some manner as shown in Figure 6.
Therefore, as to the ceasing operations recited, it is thus
apparent that the address for the instruction in Figure 6 is
ceased before accessibility begins for a corresponding data
access operation and vice versa. Appellant's arguments in the
reply brief as to claim 20 do not persuade us otherwise.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the exam-
iner rejecting claims 14 through 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
affirmed
only as to claim 20. Therefore, the decision of the examiner
is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
con- nection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §
1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007