Appeal No. 1996-4025
Application 07/995,591
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejec-
tion of claims 1 through 9, 11 through 19, and 21 through 30.
Claims 10 and 20 have been objected to for being dependent
upon a rejected claim. Appellants filed an amendment after
final which was entered by the Examiner. The amendment can-
celled claims 7, 9, 10, 17, 19 and 20, and amended claims 5,
8, 11 and 18. The amendment also added new claims 33 through
38. On page 1 of the Examiner's answer, the Examiner states
that claims 1, 3 through 6, 8, 11, 13 through 16, 18, 23
through 26, 29 and 30 are rejected, and claims 2 and 12 are
objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim.
The Examiner also states that claims 21, 22, 27, 28, and 31
through 38 are allowed.
The invention relates to high performance cell based
network interfaces.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007