Ex parte OSKOUY et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1996-4025                                                        
          Application 07/995,591                                                      



          payloads between  said staging means and said ATM switches,                 
          said MCM means asynchronously popping said transmit cell                    
          payloads from said staging means and packing said transmit                  
          cell payloads before transmitting them to said ATM switches,                
          and unpacking said receive cell payloads upon receiving them                
          from said ATM switches before pushing them into said staging                
          means, said MCM means further maintaining said DMA state                    
          blocks.                                                                     
                    The references relied on by the Examiner are as                   
          follows:                                                                    
          Hedlund                        5,136,584         Aug.  4, 1992              
          Yanagi et al. (Yanagi)         5,280,475         Jan. 18, 1994              
          (filed Aug. 14,                                                             
          1991)                                                                       
          Burrows                        5,303,302         Apr. 12, 1994              
          (filed June 18,                                                             
          1992)                                                                       





                    Claims 29 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
          § 102 as being anticipated by Hedlund.  Claims 1, 3 through 5,              
          8, 11, 13 through 15, 18, and 23 through 26 stand rejected                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hedlund in                 
          view of Burrows.  Claims 6 and 16 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hedlund in view of                  
          Burrows and Yanagi.                                                         
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007