Ex parte SANO et al. - Page 4




               Appeal No. 1997-1655                                                                                               
               Application 07/797,893                                                                                             


                      executing a connected region expanding process onto 3-dimensional voxel data of an object to                
               extract a region corresponding to a substructure of said object from said 3-dimensional voxel data, said           
               connected region expansion process starting from a seed voxel and including automatic repetitions of an            
               expansion substep wherein a plurality of voxels are incorporated into extracted voxels on the condition            
               that said voxels are adjacent to previously incorporated voxels and satisfy expansion criteria;                    


                      executing 3-dimensional perspective projection process onto extracted voxels after each                     
               repetition of said expansion substep is completed to generate and renew image data for a perspective               
               projection image successively; and                                                                                 

                      displaying the perspective projection image onto the 2-dimensional display in a realtime manner             
               simultaneously with repetitions of said expansion substep.                                                         

                      The following references are relied on by the examiner:                                                     

               Crawford (Crawford ‘202)              4,903,202                             Feb. 20, 1990                          
               Crawford (Crawford ‘148)              4,905,148                             Feb. 27, 1990                          

               Robb et al (Robb), “Interactive Display and Analysis of 3-D Medical Images,” IEEE Transactionson                   
               Medical Imaging, Vol. 8 no. 3, September 1989, pages 217-226.                                                      

                      The rejection of claim 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as lacking adequate written               

               description, has been withdrawn (see Answer, pages 1 and 2).2                                                      

                      The rejection of claims 13 to 15, 17, and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                    

               being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter regarded as the     

               invention has been withdrawn (see Answer, page 2).                                                                 

                      Claims 13 to 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the                      


                      2 The Answer states that "Claim 21 is allowed" (Answer, page 1).                                            
                                                                4                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007