Ex parte BRENNER et al. - Page 22




          Appeal No. 98-1012                                                          
          Serial No. 08/117,342                                                       




               To the extent that the examiner is relying on the                      
          disclosure as a suggestion to include a non-coliform                        
          suppressing agent, we come to the opposite conclusion. Edberg               
          (column 3, lines 45-48) teaches restricting the nutrients such              
          that Athe media is so specific that the invention does not                  
          have to be sterilized before use.@ This would suggest                       
          adjusting the nutrients alone without a suppressing agent; the              
          addition of such an agent would be superfluous. In this regard              
          Edberg teaches away from employing the claimed suppressing                  
          agent.                                                                      


               With respect to any potential Aantibiotic effect@ on non-              
          coliforms from Edberg=s lack of nutrients, this is immaterial               







          because it is neither a teaching nor a suggestion of the                    




                                          22                                          





Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007