Ex parte BRENNER et al. - Page 25




                 Appeal No. 98-1012                                                                                                                    
                 Serial No. 08/117,342                                                                                                                 




                                                                                                 )  INTERFERENCES                                      
                                                                                                 )                                                     
                                                                                                 )                                                     
                                                                                                 )                                                     
                                            HUBERT C. LORIN                                      )                                                     
                                            Administrative Patent Judge                          )                                                     

                 HCL/dal                                                                                                                               
                 GLENNA HENDRICKS                                                                                                                      
                 HENDRICKS & ASSOCIATES                                                                                                                
                 P.O. BOX 2509                                                                                                                         
                 FAIRFAX, VA  22031-2509                                                                                                               
    1.       5.       A medium of claim 4 wherein the cephalosporin used to suppress growth of non-                                                    
    coliform bacteria is Cefsulodin.                                                                                                                   
    2. The rejection has been applied against claim 5. It should                                                                                       
    have also applied to claims 4 and 23, on which claim 5                                                                                             
    depends. They also broadly include Cefsulodin as a                                                                                                 
    suppressing agent without mentioning a specific                                                                                                    
    concentration and therefore should have raised the same                                                                                            
    concern.                                                                                                                                           
    3. Note also that dependent claims 4, 5, 26 and 27 further                                                                                         
    limit Athe agent used to suppress growth of non-coliform                                                                                           
    gram negative bacteriaY@ to a particular antibiotic.                                                                                               












                                                                          25                                                                           





Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25

Last modified: November 3, 2007