THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM B. ALBERY and LLOYD D. TRIPP
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2854
Application No. 08/500,2781
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claims 1 through 7, as amended subsequent to the final
rejection.
Claims 8 and 9, the other claims pending in this application,
were not rejected in the final rejection.2,3
1Application for patent filed July 10, 1995.
2While the Office Action Summary of the final rejection
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007