Ex parte ALBERY et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1998-2854                                       Page 8           
          Application No. 08/500,278                                                  


               Additionally, all the claims under appeal require a                    
          plurality of leg and body encircling bladders connected in                  
          pneumatic series from encircling bladders furthermost from the              
          heart to encircling bladders innermost toward (i.e., closest                
          to) the heart.  It is our opinion, that this limitation is                  
          also not suggested by the applied prior art.  In that regard,               
          we note that Arkans' bladders are not connected in pneumatic                
          series and that Newman's bladders while connected in pneumatic              
          series are not connected in pneumatic series from the bladders              
          furthermost from the heart to the bladders closest to the                   
          heart.                                                                      


               For the reasons stated above, the decision of the                      
          examiner to reject claims 1 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is              
          reversed.                                                                   


          New ground of rejection                                                     
               Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), we enter the                
          following new ground of rejection.                                          










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007