Appeal No. 1996-0455
Application No. 07/511,778
With respect to the decoding of a primary instruction,
and the decoding of a sub-instruction when needed by the
primary instruction in claim 11, the examiner has not stated
where such instruction decoding can be found in Katsura. The
obviousness rejection of claim 11 is, therefore, reversed
because of the lack of a prima facie case of obviousness.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007