THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WAYNE R. MATSON
__________
Appeal No. 1996-3409
Application 08/092,5431
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges and
McKELVEY Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed Aug. 16, 1993. According to appellant, this application is a
continuation of application 07/643,541, filed Jan. 18, 1991, which is a continuation-in-part of application
07/274,505 filed Nov. 21, 1988, now U.S. patent no. 5,104,639, issued, Apr. 14, 1992, which is a divisional
of application 06/797,615 filed Nov. 13, 1985, now U.S. patent no. 4,863,873, issued Sep. 5, 1989, which is
a continuation of application 06/670,483 filed Nov. 13, 1984, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part
of application 06/579,401 filed Feb. 17, 1984, now U.S. patent no. 4,511,659, issued Apr. 16, 1985, which
is a continuation-in-part of application 06/472,387 filed Mar. 4, 1983, now abandoned, which is a
continuation-in-part of application 06/425,183 filed Sep. 28, 1982, now abandoned, which is a continuation
of application 06/111,917 filed Jan. 14, 1980, now U.S. patent no. 4,404,065, issued Sep. 13, 1983.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007