Ex parte PALM et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today               
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 21              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte GORDON F. PALM                                
                                and R. GEORGE HARTIG                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1997-0844                                  
                             Application No. 08/269,979                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       
          Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and WALTZ Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                       
          examiner’s refusal to allow claims 18, 25 and 28, as amended                
          subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendments dated                 
          Jan. 11, 1996, Paper No. 12, and Apr. 5, 1996, Appendix B                   
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007