Ex parte NILSEN - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-3240                                                        
          Application 08/176,940                                                      

               a code memory for storing a plurality of code words for a              
          plurality of encoding levels, the addresses of the code words               
          for each encoding level being denoted by an ordered sequence                
          of integers beginning with 0, a 0 being stored initially at                 
          each memory address;                                                        



               a means for entering simultaneously into the code memory               
          at a plurality of addresses a code word for each of a                       
          plurality of encoding levels, the addresses for each level                  
          being those included within a specified beginning address and               
          a specified ending address, the code words, the encoding                    
          levels, the beginning addresses, and the ending addresses                   
          being supplied through an input port.                                       
               The Examiner relies on the following reference:                        
          McEntee et al. (McEntee)           4,797,810                Jan .           
          10, 1989                                                                    
               Claims 13 through 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                  
          112, second paragraph, as being single means claims having                  
          “undue breadth.”  Claims 1 through 4, 8 and 9 stand rejected                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over McEntee.                                         
               Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant and the                  
          Examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for                 
          the respective details thereof.                                             
                                      OPINION                                         
               After careful review of the evidence before us, we do not              
          agree with the Examiner that claims 13 through 17 are properly              

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007