Ex parte YONEKAWA et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1998-0126                                                        
          Application 08/272,700                                                      


          4 to 6 obvious there over.  Compton’s range of the ratio D/P                
          is 0.75 to 3.0.  Compton’s preferred (optimized) ratio is                   
          1.42.  (See column 5, lines 29-43.)  We fail to see how                     
          Compton’s ratio of 3, or optimized ratio of 1.42, meets or                  
          makes obvious the claimed ratio range of 4 to 6.  It is not                 
          Appellants’ disclosure                                                      




          that must be optimized to meet the claim limitations, but the               
          reference’s disclosure that should be optimized.  Thus,                     
          Compton does not teach or suggest (even through optimization)               
          the claim 5 limitations, and we will not sustain its                        
          rejection.                                                                  
                    Claim 6 requires the same sharp discharge ends, and               
          additionally that the ends be made of recited amounts of                    
          nickel and chromium, and be coated with a material having a                 
          high electric resistance.  The Examiner notes that Compton                  
          discloses the sharp ends made of stainless steel (column 3,                 
          lines 54-55).  The Examiner further notes that Woell teaches                
          it is well known that stainless steel is made of the recited                


                                         -12-12                                          





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007