Ex parte FIORDALICE et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                               Paper No. 24           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                                      Ex parte                                        
                     ROBERT W. FIORDALICE, STANLEY M. FILIPIAK,                       
          JOHNSON O. OLOWOLAFE, and HISAO KAWASAKI                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1998-0178                                  
                             Application No. 08/254,854                               
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    

          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                 
          the examiner’s rejection of claims 24 and 26-30, which                      
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.                     
                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007